Skip to main content

What are mobile games selling?

Previously we talked about mobile gaming and how it's very definitely a pervasive thing that "everyone" is into.

Have no fear, this isn't a post to rant about gaming or shame you about how much you spend. Or what type of games you play. It's not going to be about "you".
But just maybe it will reframe some aspects of mobile games in a way you didn't realize.

Because mobile games sell a very different kind of product.

So just to be clear, we're not talking about every mobile game or video game doing this. However, most games that are offered free-to-play do this in some form or another, in order to help recover their development cost.
Even though you see a lot of cloned games, making those games -- even just making the art and sound to dress a clone up as another game -- costs money.
And it's not wrong to make money to cover your costs. I'm not going to rant about that.
I just want to point out that mobile games often sell you a very different kind of product compared to other industries.

Most products "solve a problem". They identify a need, and sell you the solution.
Typically the need pre-exists. For example, you want flour to do some baking. You can grow your own wheat and grind it into flour... Or you can buy it pre-made.
Problem - You want flour.
Solution - Buy flour that's premade.

Mobile games however often use a type of monetization that goes like this:
Mobile games create a problem. Then sell you the solution.

Harry Potter Hogwarts Mystery is a mobile game I like and have played for months. This picture shows you one of the ways they monetize.


In Slide 1 you see that I am currently in a task "Question the Suspects". I have 4h 42m 28s left to complete this task; if the timer runs out and I haven't done so, the task will fail and I have to start all over again. I have made partial progress but there's still quite a ways to go.

This task requires "Energy" to complete and I am currently out of that resource. I can wait for it to replenish, or I can buy more right now. 30 points of Energy still won't be enough to complete the task but I can at least make progress.
If I accept, this will cost me 55 gems. It happens that I do have enough gems, but let's look at the cost of gems in Slide 2. Let's ignore the fact that I can't buy exactly 55 gems but just focus on the cost of the gems: It will cost just over $2 to get that extra progress of 30 Energy now.
This doesn't sound like much, especially if you buy a coffee and donut at Tim Hortons every morning for example.

There's a lot of systems here that I haven't gotten into -- and this blog post will go on forever if I start to get into even a fraction of them. And this post isn't to argue about whether is right or wrong, good or bad, fair or unfair...

All I want to observe in this post is the fact that progress is stuck because the developers created the problem: They made the task cost Energy, they limited that Energy, and they put in a failure condition. All this is entirely of their design as the "game mechanic".

And then they offer you an expedient solution -- pay them money.

You can reframe this any way you want, but I feel it is valid to say they are selling you a solution to a problem they created.

A corollary to this is, they create pain, and you pay them to relieve that pain.

This makes mobile games a very odd product. When you have to pay someone to avoid the pain they are creating, we variously call those situations "blackmail", "extortion", "protection racket", etcetera.

In my next post I'll make observations about some consequences of this.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trafalgar's European Explorer 2006 memoirs part 3

A picture from my 2006 trip, a Trafalgar 's bus tour, on an itinerary called the European Explorer. I can't remember why I had this couple in the picture, but I do vaguely remember this to be in London, on the first official day of the tour group getting together. Their insistence on my helping them take a picture caused the three of us to be late getting back to the bus. The local tour guide had a "rule" about lateness, that we had to buy chocolate to share with everyone. As it turned out, later in the trip, on at least two occasions, we were stuck on the highway on either a long commute or a traffic jam, and I had chocolate and chocolate-covered marzipan to share. About the chocolate-covered marzipan -- Apparently we were in Austria just as they were celebrating Mozart's birthday with special marzipans wrapped in foil with the famous composer's picture. I'm pretty sure it was Mirabell Mozartkugeln . Anyway, there were enough to go around the en

Trafalgar's European Explorer 2006 memoirs part 10

The last of my pictures (at least the ones that survived the cheesy disposable cameras) from my 2006 trip, a Trafalgar 's bus tour, on an itinerary called the European Explorer. Below is the obligatory group photo. Not sure everyone's in it, actually. I'm pretty sure this one was taken by the tour director, Mike Scrimshire as I'm in the back row, on the right side.

Trafalgar's European Explorer 2006 memoirs part 9

More assorted couples on my 2006 trip, a Trafalgar 's bus tour, on an itinerary called the European Explorer. An American couple who joked about being from "the land of the giants" -- and with good reason, because both of them were really tall! A cute Jewish mother-daughter pair who ducked out part-way to divert to Israel. I vaguely remember the issue of the daughter being an orthodox Jew was highlighted in France when, to make things easy, she just declared herself vegetarian for the wait staff. I also remember there was some logistics error in France because our party size was way underestimated or simply relayed incorrectly, and there was a shortage of food at dinner. Dessert came as an unopened can of yogurt. It did not seem like they tried to make it up to us later, either. Plus there was smoking every which way in France, and I had a helluva time with that. We were also in a hotel that seemed tucked away in the burbs, and not walking distance from anythin