Skip to main content

Proposal for Transparency on International Law Compliance Act

With so many lies coming from the Trump administration, I felt it might be prudent to proactively safeguard truth and the rule of law in Canada. Sad that it has come to this.


Subject: Proposal for Transparency on International Law Compliance Act

Dear Ms. May, Ms. McPherson, and Mr. Blanchet,

I am writing to share a legislative proposal that I believe aligns with the shared values of transparency, accountability, and respect for international law upheld by your parties.

The proposal is for a Transparency on International Law Compliance Act — a straightforward, non-restrictive transparency measure requiring the Government of Canada to disclose publicly whether any country, entity, or armed group it supports is in violation of international law, and whether Canada’s support could place our country in violation of international law.

Importantly, this legislation does not restrict or delay government actions. It simply ensures that when Canada publicly expresses support—whether through military aid, financial assistance, diplomatic endorsement, or political alignment—neutral, factual information regarding the international legal context is included.

I am not a specialist in international law and do not present myself as such. This idea was developed with the assistance of ChatGPT by OpenAI, which helped structure the legal framework and draft the attached preliminary legislative text.

If this proposal aligns with your party’s priorities, I would be honored if you would consider exploring or adapting it further within your appropriate forums.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Kind regards,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Info, if you wish]


Appendix: Draft Legislative Text

Transparency on International Law Compliance Act

Short Title:
This Act may be cited as the Transparency on International Law Compliance Act.


Purpose:
To ensure that the Government of Canada’s public support for foreign entities is accompanied by clear, factual disclosure regarding international law.


Definitions:

  • Support includes military, intelligence, financial, logistical, diplomatic, political, or public endorsements of a foreign state, entity, or armed group.

  • Violation of international law means a breach determined by authoritative bodies, including:

    • The United Nations (UN)

    • The International Court of Justice (ICJ)

    • The International Criminal Court (ICC)

    • Canadian courts

    • Other widely recognized international legal authorities


Core Disclosure Requirements:

  1. When the Government of Canada publicly expresses support for a foreign state, entity, or armed group, it must explicitly disclose:

    • Whether the recipient has been found to be in violation of international law by recognized authorities.

    • Whether Canada’s intended support could place Canada in violation of international law.

  2. Disclosures must:

    • Be included in the initial public communication of support, or

    • If no formal announcement is made, be published within seven (7) days of the support becoming publicly known.


Parliamentary Oversight:
All disclosures made under this Act must be formally tabled in Parliament within thirty (30) days of the public communication.


National Security:
This Act does not apply to classified operations unless the government publicly communicates those operations. It does not require the release of classified information; it applies only to information already being publicly shared.


General Provisions:
This Act does not restrict, delay, or otherwise interfere with the Government of Canada’s ability to provide support to foreign states, entities, or armed groups. Its sole purpose is to ensure transparent and factual disclosure for the benefit of the Canadian public.


French version to follow.


Version française (à envoyer séparément ou en copie) :

Objet : Proposition de loi sur la transparence en matière de conformité au droit international

Madame May, Madame McPherson, Monsieur Blanchet,

Je me permets de vous adresser une proposition législative qui, je l’espère, retiendra votre attention et correspondra aux valeurs de transparence, d’imputabilité et de primauté du droit international défendues par vos partis.

Il s’agit d’une Loi sur la transparence en matière de conformité au droit international, visant à obliger le gouvernement canadien à divulguer clairement, lors de toute annonce de soutien à un État, une entité ou un groupe armé étranger, si ce dernier est en violation du droit international, et si le soutien canadien pourrait exposer notre pays à une telle violation.

Cette loi ne restreint ni ne retarde aucune action gouvernementale. Elle impose simplement une obligation de transparence en fournissant des informations factuelles et neutres au public lors de ces annonces.

Je ne suis pas spécialiste en droit international et ne souhaite pas me présenter comme tel. Cette idée a été développée avec l’aide de ChatGPT d’OpenAI, outil que j’ai utilisé pour structurer le cadre juridique et rédiger le texte législatif ci-joint.

Si cette proposition correspond à vos priorités, je serais honoré qu’elle soit explorée ou adaptée dans les forums appropriés.

Je vous remercie sincèrement pour votre temps et votre considération.

Cordialement,
[Votre nom]
[Vos coordonnées, si vous le souhaitez]


Annexe : Texte législatif proposé

Loi sur la transparence en matière de conformité au droit international

Titre abrégé :
La présente loi peut être citée sous le nom de Loi sur la transparence en matière de conformité au droit international.


Objet :
Assurer que le gouvernement du Canada divulgue clairement, lors de toute annonce publique de soutien à des entités étrangères, des informations factuelles concernant le droit international.


Définitions :

  • Soutien inclut l’aide militaire, le partage de renseignements, l’aide financière ou logistique, les endorsements diplomatiques, les déclarations publiques d’alignement ou tout autre appui.

  • Violation du droit international signifie une infraction déterminée par des organismes autorisés, tels que :

    • Les Nations Unies (ONU)

    • La Cour internationale de Justice (CIJ)

    • La Cour pénale internationale (CPI)

    • Les tribunaux canadiens

    • Autres autorités juridiques internationales largement reconnues


Exigences de divulgation :

  1. Lorsqu’une annonce publique exprime un soutien, le gouvernement doit divulguer explicitement :

    • Si le destinataire est en violation du droit international selon des autorités reconnues.

    • Si le soutien canadien pourrait exposer le Canada à une violation du droit international.

  2. Les divulgations doivent :

    • Être incluses dans la communication initiale, ou

    • Être publiées dans un délai de sept (7) jours si aucune annonce formelle n’est faite.


Surveillance parlementaire :
Toutes les divulgations doivent être déposées au Parlement dans un délai de trente (30) jours suivant la communication publique.


Sécurité nationale :
La loi ne s’applique pas aux opérations classifiées sauf si elles sont rendues publiques, et ne requiert pas la divulgation d’informations classifiées.


Dispositions générales :
Cette loi ne restreint ni ne retarde les actions du gouvernement, son seul but est d’assurer une divulgation transparente et factuelle.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trafalgar's European Explorer 2006 memoirs part 3

A picture from my 2006 trip, a Trafalgar 's bus tour, on an itinerary called the European Explorer. I can't remember why I had this couple in the picture, but I do vaguely remember this to be in London, on the first official day of the tour group getting together. Their insistence on my helping them take a picture caused the three of us to be late getting back to the bus. The local tour guide had a "rule" about lateness, that we had to buy chocolate to share with everyone. As it turned out, later in the trip, on at least two occasions, we were stuck on the highway on either a long commute or a traffic jam, and I had chocolate and chocolate-covered marzipan to share. About the chocolate-covered marzipan -- Apparently we were in Austria just as they were celebrating Mozart's birthday with special marzipans wrapped in foil with the famous composer's picture. I'm pretty sure it was Mirabell Mozartkugeln . Anyway, there were enough to go around the en...

Trafalgar's European Explorer 2006 memoirs part 10

The last of my pictures (at least the ones that survived the cheesy disposable cameras) from my 2006 trip, a Trafalgar 's bus tour, on an itinerary called the European Explorer. Below is the obligatory group photo. Not sure everyone's in it, actually. I'm pretty sure this one was taken by the tour director, Mike Scrimshire as I'm in the back row, on the right side.

Trafalgar's European Explorer 2006 memoirs part 9

More assorted couples on my 2006 trip, a Trafalgar 's bus tour, on an itinerary called the European Explorer. An American couple who joked about being from "the land of the giants" -- and with good reason, because both of them were really tall! A cute Jewish mother-daughter pair who ducked out part-way to divert to Israel. I vaguely remember the issue of the daughter being an orthodox Jew was highlighted in France when, to make things easy, she just declared herself vegetarian for the wait staff. I also remember there was some logistics error in France because our party size was way underestimated or simply relayed incorrectly, and there was a shortage of food at dinner. Dessert came as an unopened can of yogurt. It did not seem like they tried to make it up to us later, either. Plus there was smoking every which way in France, and I had a helluva time with that. We were also in a hotel that seemed tucked away in the burbs, and not walking distance from anythin...